Mamamia!

A couple of weeks ago, a piece I wrote about cultural identity within Australia, was published by Mamamia. This is one of Australia’s most popular lifestyle sites and although it does not report any information about social policy in the UK or Matt Damon, I now follow it regularly.

I have not been published since I won that ACT primary schools competition in 1986, so the word “excitement” does not adequately describe my state of mind. It all happened very quickly – on a Tuesday morning, Mamamia asked for a photo of me for the piece. Not wanting to keep them waiting and fearful I would lose this opportunity, I frantically searched through our library of thousands of digital family photos for one of me. Turns out there are none. In 200 years my descendants will not know what I looked like because I was always behind the camera. They will however marvel at how handsome, happy and prolifically photographed Husband is with our children.

And so it came to pass that little Tercero (aged almost 3) had to take my photograph for me (obviously because Newborn, aged 17 months, can’t actually lift our heavy Canon EOS 350). A couple of hours later, my Millenium Falcon and I were on the internet. Let me know what you think:

http://www.mamamia.com.au/news/where-do-i-come-from/

PS. Please ignore the haircut – I think the hairdresser thought I was playing Opposites when I asked her to “trim only, no bob please…”. Incidentally, I gave Prima (aged 7) the exact same haircut in the bath for free.

How do I love thee? Let me count the ways…

I love this blogpost by The Sarah Monologues. I am like Sarah’s husband –  I’ve failed miserably at Statement Presents and organising sufficiently special celebrations for birthdays, Father’s Day etc.  Like her husband, for me it’s the little things that say “I love you” without actually saying “I love you”.

My Husband is more like Sarah. He makes sure my birthdays and Mother’s Day are “special” ie. chore free (at least until 11am) and he loves to give and receive thoughtful presents on these special days. Making the day special is what says “I love you” for him.

Sarah’s blogpost also reminded me of a fight Husband I had many years ago. I had been suffering from the flu and I asked if we could postpone his birthday celebration until the following weekend. Husband said “Of course”. At least I thought that was what he said. The next day, as agreed, we did not celebrate Husband’s birthday and that night Husband had the only tantrum of our marriage (I will not disclose how many tantrums I’ve had, lest I lose the shaky moral high ground from which I narrate this story).

To put this into context, Husband is as relaxed as I am highly strung. So his reaction to the non-birthday was a complete mystery to me. I launched the “But you said…” Defence, which failed.  Then I tried the mature response of flying into a hysterical rage, which also failed. And then I did what any woman would do in this situation – I called my best girlfriends to complain.

It was Friend B who told me about Love Languages.  Now I am not one to buy into self-help or pop psychology. (Actually, I totally am.  I love self-help books and even though I don’t have time to read them any more, I still occasionally buy them in airports in the hope that the mere act of acquisition will help me to live more authentically and take control of my life NOW etc).

The Love Languages theory goes that people show their love to others in different ways; and people need different things in order to feel loved.

In my family, my parents rarely say “I love you”, they never gush with emotion, birthdays are barely celebrated and I wouldn’t expect any one to buy me a cake let alone a present. But I can not think of a single day when my parents did not make me feel special or loved. They expressed this love by looking after me and I showed it back by looking after them and myself. My Husband’s mother thinks my upbringing was part Dickensian, part Vulcan.

So, shortly after Birthdaygate, when she blamed herself for her son’s tantrum righteous indignation with a “I should have bought him a cake, I always buy him a cake,” I resisted the temptation to administer the Vulcan death-grip and I realised that throughout Husband’s life, his beautiful mother made her son feel loved all the time, but especially special on birthdays – the big cake, the big card, the big present. This is how Husband understands being loved on this particular day and I had not said “I love you” in the way he needed to hear it.

When Husband and I got married, we should have exchanged decoder rings rather than wedding rings. It took Birthdaygate for us to start deciphering each other’s often heavily encrypted messages of love. Reverting to my professional training in times of crisis, I drafted Husband a contract list, stipulating my “acts of love”. The list included (but was not limited to):

– cooking his favourite food and making dinner every night;

– making sure his laundry was always done so that he didn’t have to go to work commando (cue the soundtrack to Born Free);

– enabling him to play football with his friends every week whilst I looked after the children, cooked his favourite Sunday lunch and checked his underpants;

– making time to talk, cuddle and check his underpants.

Whilst all this makes me sound pathetically Stepford, it is perhaps just typically Sri Lankan. I have been raised to show my love by looking after the object of my love. The self-martydom that is synonymous with this kind of “loving” will be reserved for a separate blogpost.

I also gave Husband a list of some of the things he does (…or could do) that make me feel loved by him:

– making my morning coffee;

– picking up after himself immediately rather than leaving it for “Later”, the place chores go to die or wait for me to do them;

– helping with household chores instead of assuming the magical house fairies will do it;

– doing the hard stuff with the children, not just the fun stuff;

– taking out the trash without being asked (I told him this is really all the seduction I need. I am quite easy.)

Specific performance of the above makes me feel special. I’m not saying I would say no to a Clinique gift pack or a Battle Star Galactica box set. I’m just saying that such gifts are not adequate damages for failure to comply.

The first couple of years after Birthdaygate I bought spare birthday cards, diarised reminders months in advance and researched presents – all for the dual purpose of making Husband feel special in the way that he understood it, and sadistically reminding him what a baby he was. The passing years have relaxed and reformed me. I now enjoy making Husband feel special on his birthday without making a point. He does my chores on my birthday and he does his chores most other days of the year. He does the hard stuff, not just the fun stuff, and often he makes the hard stuff more fun. On birthdays we both enjoy getting homemade cakes and cards from our children and we both love it when he takes out the trash.

Things I miss about London (Part 4): Cumbersome Racial Sub-Classifications

Moving to any new country involves mind-numbing amounts of paperwork and form-filling. Official forms often contain an ethnic or racial profile section, with a list of boxes to choose from and tick. In Britain, Sri Lankans are classified as “British Asian (Other)”. Despite an important presence in the national consciousness thanks to high profile people such as George Alagiah and the Sri Lankan cricket team, and providing the world with cheap holidays, a safe haven for European paedophiles and an awesome aubergine curry, British Asian (Sri Lankans) do not get their own tick box, unlike the British Asian (Indians), the British Asian (Pakistanis) and the British Asian (Bangladeshis).

When I first moved to England over a decade ago, I was a little offended by this, as I am sure the British Asian (East African Indians, South African Indians, Malaysian Indians and Singaporean Indians etc), with whom we share the “(Other)” box, are. I don’t mean to be petty but I really think we should get our own tick box.

Of course, then we moved to Australia, and it turns out all we are is “Not ATSI” (Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islanders). I kept checking my forms for more boxes, desperate to define my demographic in greater detail (where is the box for Left-handed, Reformed Vegetarian, Pedantic Mild Neurotics?), but apparently on Australian forms, it is binary. You are ATSI or you are not.

In my first few years of moving to London, Selfridges ran a Bollywood Summer campaign on Oxford Street, the National Film Theatre showed Bollywood films as well as Satyajit Ray films, Bhangra clubs were opening in Mayfair, East is East became an international success, chicken tikka masala was declared our national dish, and being British Asian was confusingly cool. The British Asian was everywhere from its most high profile civil liberties advocate (Shami – love your work), to its greatest writers (Salman, Zadie – love your work too, and Vikram, you know you’re practically British), to its finest journalists (George, Mishal, Krishnan – I love you). The British Asian was versatile – both high brow and low brow. Whenever East Enders, The Bill or Spooks needed a gangster, terrorist, corner store owner or some one to be forced into an arranged marriage, there we were, typecast but present and proud of it.

I haven’t worked out yet what our racial sub-classification is in Australia, or whether the Australian equivalent of the British Asian even has a title here. Recently, after weeks of heated negotiations by the children and more weeks of desperate pleading by me, I finally conceded defeat and agreed to help out at the school canteen. It’s not that I lack school spirit. It’s just that I can’t do maths under pressure and the thought of being asked to price and add a sausage roll, a chocolate milk and a Wot-Wot (apparently you are not allowed to say “What the hell is a Wot-Wot?” in the school canteen) together, and then subtract it from $10 to provide the correct amount of change, whilst surrounded by hungry, financially literate primary schoolers, fills me with fear.

I must really love my children, because I found myself in Hell’s Kitchen, making hundreds of ham rolls. Between recess and lunch, the school canteen mummies got a chance to talk as we buttered nut-free bread together. The conversation turned to which races were moving into which suburbs of our neighbourhood, Sydney’s North Shore. According to the other mummies (5 of them White Australian, 3 of them 7th generation Australian, and none of them racist), the “Asians” were moving in.

I was confused- I was sure that had there been a massive influx of Asians to our neighbourhood (as per the British definition), I would have noticed. At the very least, my grandmother would have called me from the other side of Sydney to tell me the Asians were coming. Then I got worried that perhaps the mummies meant us – the arrival of the six members of the Duck Family had changed the local Asian (Other) demographic by at least 300%.

I put my hand up to ask a question (because when I am in any school, deeply ingrained grammar school training takes over and I can’t speak without raising my hand first). I asked my new work colleagues for clarification of the term Asian. I think they sensed I was a lawyer or may be they realised that I might also consider myself Asian. Either way, they hastily explained that by Asian, they meant South East Asian.

Apparently, various people from South East Asia are moving into the local suburbs: the Koreans to Killara, the HK Chinese to Lindfield and the mainland Chinese to Chatswood. This summary was offered by the canteen mummies, not as a criticism, simply as an observation of local migration patterns. They also noted that many children in local classrooms today are not first/multi-generation Australian, they are the children of immigrants.

The expression “immigrants” in Australia always confuses me, even when it is used innocuously, because:

(a) I vaguely remember learning about Mabo v Queensland in which the High Court recognised that the Aborigines (and their land rights) existed here thousands of years before European colonisation; and

(b) when anthropologists and archaeologists talk about New World migration models and the Asians moving in, they are talking about Asians walking across the Berengia land bridge into Alaska some 15,000 years ago.

So to me, all people who arrived in the last 24 hours to 223 years, classify as immigrants. I didn’t want to have that conversation with my new mummy friends because they all seemed really welcoming towards the immigrants they spoke of, and they all thought that a diverse population was good for their children. Plus, I had already said the word “hell” in front of their children and I didn’t want to get a bad reputation so early in my canteen career.

I explained that I was born in the UK, raised an Australian, with a family from Sri Lanka, and English was the only language I spoke competently. I then asked them a question fully loaded with Wot-Wots: how would they describe or define my race and my nationality? (Frankly after the first 50 ham rolls I was too tired to know the difference). They answered: Indian, Pakistani or British (because of my accent). No one said Sri Lankan (I would have been surprised if they were able to identify my race); but no one said Australian (which is my nationality), and no one said Australian Asian (Other) or Australian Subcontinental or some other equally cumbersome racial sub-classification of my nationality.

That night I recalled the event to husband who took the opportunity to ask challenging questions such as “Do other Australians think of us and (more importantly) our children as Australian? Do ethnic groups in Australia celebrate their cultural similarities and differences?” Husband really needs to read Men are from Mars, Women are from Venus, and just nod empathetically instead of trying to debate or solve issues.

I don’t know what the local Australians thought when a family of Australian British Sri Lankans moved in with four children surrounded by an entourage of twenty cousins and the intoxicating aroma of aubergine curry. The neighbours all came over with wine and chocolates so I think we got off to a good start.

We haven’t been here for long enough to work out if different races, ethnic groups and cultures have their own proud, nationally recognised identity and place within a wider Australian identity outside the SBS channel. I am fairly certain that being the Australian equivalent of the British Asian isn’t cool (yet).

It is possible that an Indian family has moved into Summer Bay and I just haven’t realised it (no time to wee, no time for TV). Let’s call them the Patels. The Patel parents own the local convenience store although the Patel father used to be doctor back in India. The Patel daughter is studying to be a doctor and has an illicit white surfie boyfriend. Whenever people are injured on the beach, the eccentric but charming Grandma Patel rushes out and sprinkles turmeric on the injury. The Patel son is quietly hiding his secret identity as an Al Qaeda sleeper agent. Of course the fact that the family is clearly Hindu and not Muslim has been overlooked by the writers who will never be employed by the more culturally sensitive SBS channel. In Season 432 of Home & Away, the Patel family will invite all of Summer Bay over for a BBQ tandoori kangaroo to celebrate their new-found citizenship (and perhaps the release of the extended Patel family from Christmas Island). Little do the residents of Summer Bay know that the Patel son has been “activated” and he has spiked the tandoori marinade with anthrax.

May be the Australian equivalent of the British Asian ([insert cumbersome racial sub-classification]) will really know we’ve made it into the national consciousness when the Patels move in to Summer Bay.

I wonder about the mummies at the school canteen. May be they all assumed I was Australian and they were guessing my racial heritage rather than my nationality. May be in Australia, a country that likes to shorten every single word in the dictionary, describing some one as Australian Subcontinental (Sri Lankan) is just too much of a mouthful. May be my question scared them and they just panicked because they didn’t want to offend me. May be they didn’t actually care which box I fit into and they liked me because I seemed like a nice person who made ham rolls efficiently.

At lunch time, the children of the canteen mummies are allowed to come to the canteen and receive a free slushy. My little Prima walked up to the canteen door, her smile both shy and proud, surrounded by a little posse of friends. There was L the Chinese girl, S the Indian girl, A the white girl, R the Japanese girl and Prima the most beautiful girl in the world, bathed in sunlight and smelling like strawberries. All of them so young and untroubled by definitions, they were Australian (Non-Denominational) and all of them thrilled to get a free slushy from Prima’s mother, who is Australian (Not ATSI, Not Born Here But Raised Here And Very Happy To Be Back Here Despite Not Having My Own Tick Box) ie. Australian (NATSINBHBRHAVHTBBHDNHMOTB). Also known as “Australian” for short.

Perhaps I should have clarified (Part 2): What you are about to read is true

Michael Ondaatje once said something really clever about his Sri Lankan family and their penchant for exaggeration. I can not remember his exact words because every time I try to recall them I get distracted by what I might actually say to Michael Ondaatje if I ever ran into him. Of course even in my imagination I get so star struck I end up saying something really cheesy like:

“Hi Mike, I love your work. Can I call you Mike? No, ok, I totally understand. Really sorry. Did I mention I just love your work? Sure, I’ll leave you alone now…”

For the record, our Au pair Anecdotes sadly do not involve any exaggeration, it is all true – and very little of what you are about to read is funny. I don’t think I could make this stuff up if I tried. After we hired and fired Au Pair 1 (the negligently dangerous, irritatingly lazy one), and before we hired Au Pair 2 (the wonderful one I want to adopt), we hired Au Pair 1.5. She is named Au Pair 1.5 because she stayed half as long as Au Pair 1 ( ie. 3 weeks) and I probably should have fired her within 1.5 hours of hiring her.

I interviewed AP 1.5 several times over the phone as she lived interstate. We also interviewed her on Skype. During this time we asked her the usual questions. For example: “Now that I have explained the role, do you have the energy, fitness, stamina and strength to handle a job as demanding as this one?” On Skype, AP 1.5 explained that she was a little overweight but that she was trying hard to lose it. She said she understood the job and was confident she could do it as she had done similar live-in jobs before.

On arrival at our house, which was the first time we actually met her face to face after she had flown-in to come live with us, I didn’t need my GP mother to tell me that AP1.5 was not overweight. She was morbidly obese. I am not at all weightest and  I have nothing but sympathy for her.  However, her condition meant she could not:

(a) bend down to pick up things such as, you know, a small child;

(b) comfortably change or bathe the younger children;

(c) run after a child if one ran away from her in a dangerous place such as, you know, a carpark; or

(d) take the pram down our driveway.

Whilst I was still wondering which part of the au pair job AP1.5 thought she could actually do for us, when she told me in her interview that she could “do it all…”, other problems emerged (oh yes, there were more).

In her interview AP1.5 explained that all babies loved her, she had never met a baby that did not take to her in all her years of childcare. Her inability to physically pick up a child might have been a problem had my younger children been prepared to go anywhere near her. Every single time she entered the room, for the entire three weeks, Newborn would start crying and run away from her. Tercero’s reaction was not quite as bad. He was friendly with her, charming even. Unless she attempted to go near him, at which point he would put his little hands on his little hips and yell “Get away from me, don’t touch me. Please.”

In her interview, AP1.5 explained that she had lived with families before and she was comfortable with the intimate arrangement. Perhaps a little too comfortable. At night, AP 1.5 would come out and want to talk to me and husband at length, wearing a scanty, red, silk slip. From her dental hygiene to her swollen and discoloured ankles, AP1.5 actually reminded me of an elderly hobbit. The kind of hobbit where you are not sure if it is a male hobbit or a female hobbit. Don’t get me wrong, I love the hobbits. They saved Middle Earth and although they aren’t as glamourous as the elves, they have more courage than all of Elvendom put together. I just don’t want to see a hobbit in lingerie right before I go to bed. Husband and my father politely made it clear to me (not her) that they also did not want to see it.

On our first day together, after knowing each other for about an hour, AP1.5 told me during breakfast that she had many health issues. Apparently she was born with double the number of organs and whilst I was sympathising with these clearly terrible health problems, she told me that she “had two vaginas”. AP1.5 told me what no employer should ever have to hear. AP1.5 explained that she could not “have sex, [she] could do other stuff but not sex.” Too much information over porridge. Too much information, too much information. Too. Much. Information.

Whilst AP1.5 was very, very comfortable with us, she was not so comfortable with new people who came to our house. She would often be unable to make eye contact with new people and would sometimes walk into the room and stand between me and the new person I was talking to, blocking them with her back and then tell me something as though she could not see that I was just in the middle of a conversation with some one.

I didn’t mind the social strangeness with newcomers, it made me feel sad for her. Secundo and I suffer from shyness and I am hardly socially competent. I didn’t mind her trainspotter-like obsession with the historic movement of tectonic plates and earthquake tracking, the minute details of which she would run out of her room to share with us in an almost tourettes-ian way on an hourly basis. I am a bit like that with Star Wars. I didn’t mind that her friend Jane had researched our property on the internet and she and AP1.5 knew more about it than our agent, lawyer or mortgagor did. I too would research my new employer although I might not tell them about it. I didn’t mind the deep, irreparable grooves that were gouged out of our new, expensive, hardwood flooring, at the place where she sat at her computer researching us and her earthquake updates. I know it’s only wood.

I did mind that I often found myself at 5:30pm, alone, feeding four hungry, tired children. Prima and Secundo would be snapping at each other because one looked at the other the wrong way. Newborn and Tercero would be trying to climb onto my lap and push the other off at the same time. Whilst the older two deteriorated into a scene from Taxi Driver, and the younger two vied for territorial control, I had to wonder where was my au pair, who I was paying to help me in exactly this situation. AP1.5 was hiding in the kitchen, binge eating her dinner.

I know that AP1.5 had some serious physical and probably mental health problems. I am not heartless and I am sympathetic. The social justice lawyer in me recognised the importance of the Disability Discrimination Act and protecting the employment rights of people with illnesses. The former corporate lawyer in me recognised that AP1.5’s failure to disclose her health issues during the interview process could be construed as procurement under false pretences and wilful endangerment of the children’s safety (How did she think she was going to catch Tercero in a carpark?). In the end, it was just the mummy in me that hid in the bathroom (with several small children) and cried into whatever toilet paper was left on the toilet roll.

From about 6am until 9pm every day, like every mummy and daddy, I work: wiping tears and bottoms, nursing sicknesses, mediating conflicts, checking homework, cooking, cleaning, laundry, schlepping to activities and more. At about 9pm, I take a moment and all I ask for is two things in life:

(a) 42 minutes during which time no one is allowed to talk to me, cry near me, whinge at me or vomit on me. In these precious 42 minutes I must be allowed to watch some ridiculous American crime drama involving an interesting but not-too-challenging plot, an endearingly quirky ensemble cast and an attractive male protagonist (in this case Mark Harmon in NCIS. Mark, the passing years have been very kind to you); and

(b) a little help around the house please.

One Sunday in May, husband left on a two week business trip to London. We had just been through a week of bronchitis, bronchiolitis and a burst eardrum. We agreed that we would address the home help problem after the London trip because whilst he was away, I desperately needed a second pair of hands. I was outnumbered by sick children so any second pair of hands would do. The day after husband left, AP1.5 told me she was leaving us too. Her reasons were that she had a chest infection that might affect her undisclosed heart condition, and she was not able to do parts of the job such as “reach the cupboard on top of the fridge”. Yes, that was the part of the job she thought she could not do. She gave me 2 hours notice and left. The next day I hired an au pair agency who found me Au Pair 2 (the wonderful one I want to adopt) a few weeks later.

Michael Ondaatje, if you are reading this, every word is true. I could not have made it up or exaggerated it if I tried, even though I too suffer from that Sri Lankan affliction of Chronic Exaggeration. And Michael, I love your work.

The Dinnertime Dialogues

At dinner last night the children wanted to know why they had to eat their brocolli. I explained that brocolli is high in iron, amongst other things, which was needed to strengthen their blood.  This led to a discussion with Prima, Secundo and Tercero (aged 7, 5 and 2) about our circulatory system and I told them what my father told me as a child (over dinner): Arteries – blood away from the heart, Veins – blood towards the heart. I was just about to launch into the four chambers of the heart, when husband interrupted to ask whether this was really appropriate dinnertime conversation with children.  It hadn’t occurred to me that it might not be.

The dinnertime of my childhood involved discussions about the usual – ruffle skirts, Knight Rider and A-ha; as well as what is apparently unusual:

  • human anatomy, using the old Gray’s Anatomy, which is just like the new Grey’s Anatomy but without the sex or random shootings. Really. My father taught us all the systems of the body except the reproductive system which he skipped out of shyness. Despite bearing four children I still don’t know much about my uterus or its other related parts which I am not allowed to mention;
  • world religions, their common values and the importance of religious tolerance in an increasingly divided world, especially in the current and historic context of the use and abuse of religious rhetoric to inflame bigotry (we were slow eaters and a lot of ground was covered);
  • David Attenborough documentaries and home videos of my father using the latest equipment and techniques in neurosurgery.  According to husband, 5 year olds are supposed to know the names of the Wiggles, not the lobes of the brain.

I suppose it was a little unusual.  When my brother and I were 4 and 7, a patient (who was also a farmer) gave my father a dead goat as a gift for saving his life. Most fathers might quietly dispose of it, but our’s dissected it on the washing machine, explaining all of the systems of the body whilst my brother and I watched in awe.  My mother naturally curried the goat after the post-mortem but unfortunately I was not allowed to take its brain to school for Show and Tell.

Since we (the Duckformation family) had been living with my parents in Canberra for the past year, Appa had been teaching our children the same religious beliefs (whilst trying to explain polar magnetism to a 5 year old). My father struggles to play Guess Who with the little ducklings. Connect Four is even worse. He can’t help but try to correct them and beat them at the same time, whilst some how demonstrating that all of life’s lessons (including how to win at Connect Four) can be found in the Bhagavad Gita or the teachings of Sai Baba.

History at dinnertime, through the eyes of my father often focused on the greatness of Eastern civilisations (in particular our own).  I bet you didn’t know that some of humanity’s greatest disciplines – philosophy, medicine, physics, astronomy, yoga, meditation and cricket (yes cricket) – all originated on the Indian Sub-continent.  According to Appa, even Jesus Christ, a man/Messiah who could be said to have shaped geo-politics like no other, went to India during his missing years in the wilderness.  In his time there, he apparently met Hindu scholars and grew facial hair that could best any Indian male.

As a child this approach to knowledge and perspective on the world used to annoy me. As the bearer of children, I am grateful for these obscure and strangely-timed discussions about religion, history and physics.

As I said, it was an unusual upbringing but it’s the only upbringing I’ve had and I love it now. I don’t know much about parenting and I know that I suck at dinnertime conversation (it’s a wonder husband ever asked me out for a second date), but I do know something about religion (or at least religious tolerance), subdural haematomas, the anatomy of a goat and how to approach a male gorilla in a non-threatening manner (you should see David Attenborough do this, it is amazing).

Secundo was sick recently and instead of letting him rest in front of 12 hours of Pixar films, I insisted that we read from The Times’ Complete History of the World.  I found myself telling Secundo that whilst The Times thought that the existence of Indus Valley pottery in other parts of the world was due to trade, I thought it was completely plausible that the Indus Valley civilisation (which pre-dates most other known civilisations) had actually explored the world, taking the wisdom of the Bhagavad Gita with them. It was at that point that I knew my indoctrination was complete, my father would be proud and my children will need remedial history lessons (or remedial parenting) in due course.

It’s the little things that count

After nearly two decades of legal training, my life – even my mummy life – is broken down into 6 minute billable units. I can’t help but see the passing of time this way.  I’ve never had a biological clock; it’s always been a billable one.  Today was a day like any other day.  I call it Every Day. The billing narrative for Every Day goes like this:

0645: Wake up, pry Newborn from crook of shoulder, extract Tercero from opposite leg, roll over Prima and/or Secundo to dismount new king sized bed that sleeps entire Duck family.

0651: Microwave porridge (for 6 minutes), unload dishwasher, sterilise Newborn’s bottles from multiple night wakings and our desperate attempts to pacify him by overfeeding because the effectiveness of shush-patting is a myth and who has the stamina to control cry a baby at 3am?.

0721: Wipe the table, floor and baby chair after breakfast. So much of my life is spent on the floor that I have learned to maximise my time and do some of my best thinking down there. Recent brilliant thoughts include:

  • Email Simon Cowell about an idea for a chart topping CD.  I could record myself bleating incessant entreaties to my children to eat/change into their school uniform/brush teeth/do homework/attempt music practice/stop whingeing/stop fighting.  The CD could be marketed as a new form of white noise. Instead of womb sounds and whale songs, my voice could be used to lull babies into hibernation (or stasis); as it clearly does my children;
  • Call my health fund and check if my cover includes RWI (Repetitive Wiping Injury); and
  • I really need to wee.

0733: Bend down and pick up toys/clothes/food/tissues/nappies and return these items to their “proper” place. My need to return things to their proper place should be the subject of its own blog post, or at the very least, aggressive therapy. Make a mental note to call my health fund and check if my cover includes premature hip replacements caused by RBI (Repetitive Bending Injury).

0821: Forget to shower, stare longingly at the toilet, eat contraceptive pill and children’s leftovers for breakfast, spray children with strawberry flavoured hair detangler and sunscreen as they run out the door.

0827: Try to remember how I did this when I was working. Remember that I felt like I did everything badly. Realise I still feel like I am doing everything badly.

0921: Return from school after drop off. Go to the bathroom. Sit. Notice that the toilet roll is empty. Go completely crazy.

It’s the empty toilet roll that breaks me. The empty toilet rolls talks to me. It says that the last person who used the toilet (man, woman or child), did not care enough about the next person (ie. me) to change it. The empty toilet roll also says to me that the last person knew that I, mummy, would change it for the family; that their time (and bottom) is too important to take a moment to change it but that my time (and bottom) isn’t. This malicious little tirade by my overly articulate toilet roll sends me over the edge into the porcelain abyss.

Filled with Empty Toilet Roll Rage (this is a well documented clinical condition) I tear it from its holder and crush it with my bare hands. Whilst replacing it with a new toilet roll, I rail insanely and incoherently against the relentless domestic servitude of motherhood. If just one person in the family had done this one small task for me instead of leaving it for me, it would have been one less thing for me to do, one less chore, one extra moment in my day. One little thing would have made an enormous difference. One less thing might have made me a little less crazy.  It’s the little things that count.

1503: Pick up Secundo from school. Watch him push other kindergarteners out of the way to press his nose against the window, his enormous eyes light up when he sees me and draw me in. The door opens, he jumps down the steps, suffers my kisses with a shy smile and takes my hand. He still takes my hand.

1509: Find Prima in the playground and watch her crazy curls bob along a sea of children; a tiny, perfect body in an oversized uniform. See her start laughing uncontrollably when she finally sees Secundo and me. Brace to catch her as she throws herself into my arms. Breathe in strawberries as she locks her arms around me and won’t let go. She won’t let go.

1515: Walk home and talk about the little lizard that lives at our house. According to the children the lizard travels to school where they also see it regularly. The very same, adventurous lizard.

1521: Arrive home, say hello to the lizard, find Tercero and Newborn waiting for us with husband. Babies clamber onto my lap each pushing their little noses and soft lips into my neck. Four arms and four legs grip me hard. Feel two little hearts beating fast against my chest. Tercero’s warm, wet lips whisper “I lub you mummy” in my ear.

1527: All four ducklings challenge husband to a game of Keep Daddy Down. Husband pretends to be overcome by the immense strength of his offspring who have learned to wrestle as a pack. He collapses on the ground laughing that rich laugh I love. Watch family play. Exhale. Inhale. Close eyes. Exhale.

1533: It’s the little things that count.

Choosing my religion

On a recent (fully (extended)) family holiday, the little ducklings met a new cousin (aged 5) who greeted them with a catchy little song he seemed to have composed just for them. It went something like this: “Sai Baba, Sai Baba, Saieeeeee Babababa Ba Ba.”

Sai Baba is perhaps modern India’s second best known holyman (after the Beatles made the Maharishi super cool in the sixties). He sits on a spectrum of belief, somewhere between avatar and charlatan.

My father fervently (in fact religiously) believes that Sai Baba is The Avatar, and I’m not talking about the blockbuster. This is a belief he tried to indoctrinate us (my brother and I) with as children, and when we moved in with my parents last year, he shared this belief with my own children.

I don’t know if Sai Baba is The Avatar (or a charlatan for that matter). But when my little nephew tried to taunt my children in front of their other cousins, making them laugh with his song, it made me very upset. No one likes to see their children laughed at or feeling confused, especially when they are meeting a new social group for the first time and establishing new relationships. We’ve been doing so much of that lately, since we moved to Sydney 2 months ago, and it is exhausting.

I think for me, it was also that the children are beginning to establish their relationship with God and religion, and the shaping of that relationship is as sensitive to the teasing of a young cousin as it is to the teachings of my father.

In the year that we lived in Canberra with my parents, my Appa did his best to crash course the children in Hinduism, the unifying message of world religions and classic science fiction movies. Heavy going?  Sometimes, and sometimes just a glimpse into how our children “see” God.

Secundo recently remarked that there were not enough photos of him together with Mummy and Daddy. Actually, there are not enough photos of him or any of the others after Prima, but that’s what happens when you are second, third and fourth. His point was that he wanted to be in photos with us.  Prima comforted him with, “Well [Secundo], in all of these photos of me and Mummy, you are with God, and God is in Mummy’s heart, so actually you were with Mummy all along.”

Secundo and I had to agree with this infallible theo-logic and I was amazed that Prima, aged only 7, had applied the Advaita principle of oneness with God, that it takes most Hindus a lifetime to understand (I still don’t get it).

Of course, the Devil can quote scripture for his own ends. The next time I tried to scold Prima for some domestic infringement, she reminded me that God was within her, she was God and I shouldn’t scold God as God wouldn’t like that.

What in God’s name can you say to that? I should have said God wouldn’t whinge incessantly if He wasn’t allowed to watch High School Musical on a school night.  I only thought of that one afterwards.

Secundo’s religious fascination is with death and rebirth. He announces or asks in strange places (eg. Chatswood Westfield) and at strange times (eg. first thing in the morning (ie. 5:30am)):

“When the world ends, it will be born again won’t it?; When we die our spirit will still live like Obi Wan Kenobi won’t it? Hindus get cremated like Jedis don’t they?”

For a 5 year old, he seems uncannily comfortable with the Hindu concept of Maya, the temporal nature of our bodies and our world, and the permanent nature of the (Supreme) soul (as set out in Chapter 7 of the Bhagavad Gita and Episode IV of Star Wars).

And then there is Terecero, aged 2, who sneaks into my father’s daily personal yoga routine and copies him. One old duck in a sagging sarong and one baby duck in a sagging nappy, each saluting the Sun. We took the children to the temple one last time before we left Canberra, where Tercero wowed the old grannies by showing them his yoga: the Mountain pose, the Cobra pose, Downward Facing Dog, and then his personal composition which involves posing on all fours and lifting one leg into the air – we like to call this one Urinating Dog. We were all so proud.

I am not sure what Newborn’s religious predilections will be, he’s barely one. However, as he has spent a lot of time with me during a very stressful year of transition, I suspect his first words will be religious ones. For example: “What in God’s name is going on? Jesus bloody Christ, Mary Mother of God, Sweet Jesus, For the love of God, God damnit….” Newborn will be able to swear religiously and prolifically – to my Christian friends, I am sorry I swear in Christian but Hindus can’t swear to save their lives (“Holy Cow”? – come on people.)

Since living with my father, I can see the children’s religious views developing. When we left London, one of their favourite games was to act out the Nativity.  Yes, the Nativity. Now, they act out a hybrid version of the Nativity and that great Hindu epic, the Ramayana. In this tale, instead of going directly to the ancient kingdom of Lanka to rescue the Princess Sita (Prima), the monkey warrior Hanuman (Secundo) flies from India to John Lewis, London where he picks up a Nintendo DS, which he then takes to Bethlehem to give to the Baby Jesus (convincingly portrayed by Tercero). Baby Jesus receives his gift with the following words, “I am sick, I want Catapol.” Catapol is not the Sri Lankan version of frankincense or myrrh. It is the (mispronounced) English brand of children’s panadol (Calpol) that my hypochondriac little son of God is addicted to.

The four little ducklings are young. They are starting their physical journey through the world and a spiritual journey that they may embrace or ignore. Until they make their choices and sense what they know, feel or believe about God, I don’t want them thinking that the contemplation of God, the search for God, is uncool.  That is why I especially didn’t like them being teased by my nephew that day.

As I said, I don’t know or care if Sai Baba is the Avatar (or a charlatan), but I like the biriyani of messages and values he has stir-fried together from the religions of the world. His basic teachings are often set out in catchy little phrases that could be converted into fridge magnets. Let me paraphrase:

(a)    God is one but different people call him by different names and take different paths to reach him (Him, Her, It etc);

(b)   the best way to serve God is to serve mankind; and

(c)    be nice to every one because if you don’t karma will bite you on the arse.

So, whilst our children are choosing their spiritual path (or not), if Sai Baba, my Appa, Obi Wan or husband and I can get the above through to the four little ducklings, then that really would be cool.

Is romance in Ashes?

Last week it was our wedding anniversary. Ten years, four children, 53 stitches and one migration later, we found ourselves back at the Canberra Hyatt, the hotel where husband and I spent our wedding night.

A decade ago, we arrived there after a seven hour wedding ceremony. Neither of us had eaten all day, our facial muscles had frozen into some kind of smiling rictus and after kissing four hundred of my parents’ closest friends we were both coming out in a rash.

And then of course there was the whole mortifying experience of the trip to the Hyatt itself. My father insisted on driving us because the family astrologer had told him that our marriage had to be consummated by 8pm. No one knew whether this was Colombo time or Canberra time and I really wished they would just stop talking about it. Either way, my father, a man who takes all his duties seriously, sped the entire way to the Hyatt and marched us through an expedited check-in. At 7:50pm, he solemnly shook hands with my husband and then said (a little sheepishly), “OK, I’ve done my job. Now you two go and enjoy yourself.” I desperately wanted the Hyatt to collapse on my head but husband took it like a man, shook my dad’s hand back and said, “Thanks Uncle, we will.”

Ten years later, husband surprised me by booking a room for us at the Hyatt.  We arrived, I changed into my favorite John Lewis flannel pyjamas and went to bed. Husband turned on the television and watched the cricket for hours whilst I caught up on 8 months (or is it seven years?) of sleep deprivation. We were briefly interrupted by a waiter bearing a complimentary bottle of sparking wine. Apparently husband had ticked the “Honeymoon” box on the check-in form, as there was no a box for “10 year wedding anniversary” or “14 hour respite from children”. The waiter would have found the eager groom riveted to the Ashes and the blushing bride, dressed and snoring like a grandma.

On our tenth wedding anniversary, husband organised a beautiful hotel room (for him and Alastair Cook); a lovely dinner for him and me; he gave us a 14 hour break from our children which was enough time for him to watch the Ashes, me to get some sleep and both of us to miss them; he let me choose the TV channels (after the cricket was over for the day) because when I go to a hotel all I want to do is watch TV and sleep; he stole everything I requested from the toiletries cart parked outside our door and when he wasn’t watching the Ashes, he spooned me. Me, me, me. This is very important because usually I wake up with one to four little ducklings all demanding to be spooned. I am always the spooner, never the spoonee.

Lately Prima has been fretting about marriage – apparently my mother has told her that she has to get married and have at least one child. Husband has a policy when it comes to Prima and discussions about marriage. He goes against his Sri Lankan instinct to tell her what to do and who to marry. It must be hard for him to fight this genetic imperative, but he does it clearly and consistently because he feels it is in her best interests. Personally I think he is wasting an excellent opportunity to brainwash her.  I blame his Western liberal education.  When this beautiful little girl says in her serious voice with her serious eyes (that look exactly like his own), “What shall I do Daddy? I don’t want to get married.” he tells her that she can do whatever she wants, if she doesn’t want to get married she doesn’t have to, and she can stay with us forever.

After our anniversary celebration of sleep, the Ashes and more TV, husband drove us home. On the way he surprised me again, when he made a detour and took me to the Old Parliament House. It is a stately, beautiful building and I love it because we got married there. Ten years, four children, 53 stitches and one migration ago.

Don’t tell husband, but when Prima asks me about marriage, I break his policy although I do temper my genetic imperative. I tell her she can do whatever she wants, she doesn’t have to get married, but if she does, then it is important to choose carefully, and if she is very lucky she might marry some one wonderful like her father.

Present politics

That Jesus seemed like a great guy.  With his heavy facial hair and strong attachment to his mother, he could just as easily have been Sri Lankan as Israeli. Whatever his ethnic origin, his golden rules of Do Unto Others and Love Thy Neighbour etc seem like outstanding principles to live one’s life by. And he gets bonus points for being able to articulate a new religion in two catchy phrases, unlike Hinduism which has 4 Vedas, 108 Upanishads and I forget how many Puranas.

It seems to me that Jesus spent his life giving love, advice and bread to people in need. He was not tearing his luxurious beard out over the Toys R Us catalogue, and I think we should learn something from this.

‘Tis the season to be jolly worried about buying presents. Our children have been told that they will get three presents this year (not three hundred):  one from Mummy and Daddy, and one from each set of grandparents.

Prima has already made a list of everything she wants (usually 6 – 8 items). She then convinces her unsuspecting brother Secundo, that he wants half the things on her list. It is only on Christmas Day that he wonders why he wanted a Polly Pocket beach house in the first place, poor child. She also convinces her grandmothers that her two youngest brothers want other items from her list. They are powerless to resist her and of course believe that Tercero (aged 2 and only interested in trucks) actually needs a Nintendo DS. The whole process is Machiavellian and I am both appalled and curious to see if she ends up in politics. At the very least she ends up with everything she wants.

If it were up to me, I wouldn’t buy Christmas presents at all. Yes, you heard me.  I’ve tried running the “We’re Hindu, no presents please” argument but then I just sound like the pagan that wants to destroy Christmas and deprive children. So instead, I would prefer to lecture the children on the spiritual significance of the birth of Christ, how it has shaped the geopolitics of the last two millenia and if they want to celebrate Christmas they can donate their presents and their time to the Salvation Army.

If the children knew all of that, they’d probably put “New Mummy” on their list to Santa.

When Prima was born, my mother-in-law decided that every day was Christmas and every single time she visited us she came armed with toys. I tried explaining to her that I wanted the children to appreciate what they had, understand and respect its value, and reflect on the lives of children who didn’t have anything. I recognise that this might be a bit much to expect of a newborn but it is never too early to start indoctrinating them. I think my mother-in-law thought I was experiencing my own special form of post-natal depression.

I then tried the “She [Prima] simply can’t have everything she wants” approach, to which my mother-in-law responded with an “Of course she can.” In the end, I used to just frisk my poor mother-in-law at the door – she’d get a full body pat down and then I’d search her bags. Any illegal toys were sent back to the boot of the car which resembled a mobile toy store.

And then there is my mother – she would come to London once a year, armed with an entire suitcase of gifts. Not a little carry-on, we are talking about a jumbo Samsonite that is bigger than her, filled to bursting, with presents. Most of these were for Prima, her first grandchild, and the Sun around which she (and every toy store in Australia) revolves.

I sympathise with my mother’s need to buy her grandchildren’s love with gifts. She used to see them only once a year and she was competing against the Uber Grandma, my loving and fun-loving mother-in-law.

My Amma would promise me that she wouldn’t give the children everything at once, she would try to pace the gift-giving over her month-long stay. By Day 2 her resolve would be broken and desperate for love, she’d have given the keys to the Samsonite to the children, hoping it was the key to their hearts.

In London, for the children’s birthdays, I used to request that instead of presents, the mummies made a GBP5 contribution to Room to Read, a wonderful charity that helps children in the developing world to read. I think the mummies also thought I was experiencing my own special form of post-natal depression but they humoured me. It just didn’t make sense.  We went to parties where the gift bags we received (which used to be just lolly bags when I was a child) cost more than the present we gave.  And all of those children, including mine, had everything they needed and wanted.

I know it’s politically incorrect but for this Christmas, I was thinking that we could all put a tenner into a family kitty and then delegate to our most organised cousin the task of buying all the children in our family something small (possibly even useful).  Or we could all put into a kitty and buy food for a family that won’t be having tandoori turkey with curried potatoes this Christmas.

When we were little, my father used to tell us how he and his brothers would walk several miles to school, to save on the bus fare so they could buy a glass of faloodah (a sugary, rose syrup and milk drink), which they would then share amongst themselves. My brother and I would roll our eyes and laugh at Appa. When he takes us to the local Sri Lankan food bar now, he always orders me a faloodah and I drink it with pride at how far he has come; and fear of Type 2 diabetes.

I do buy my children gifts, I am not a monster. I love buying gifts for them, my cousins and my friends. And of course I enjoy receiving gifts. For our recent 10th wedding anniversary, my one stipulation was “no jewellery” not because I have eschewed materialism for a more meaningful life, but because all I’ve ever wanted in life is an overpriced house in the lower north shore, a home loan and an original Millenium Falcon model. Check.

I just resent and rail against the expectation that our children are entitled to many great presents.  When my father was a child I don’t think he expected any.  I’d like to know when in human history, Christmas became less of a time when we were grateful for what we had, and more of a time when we wanted and expected more. When Santa was invented, who decided his elves should be making toys for children around the world?  Why aren’t they cooking a chicken curry and dhal for the world’s hungry or mass producing vaccines for preventable diseases?

I think that the gifts our children seem to enjoy the most are the toiletries we steal from hotels, and empty tissue boxes and toilet rolls sticky taped to make the Millenium Falcon (because no one is allowed to touch my original Millenium Falcon model). They don’t play with the Dora doll’s house we bought them on eBay, they make their own house out of sofa cushions and bedsheets, and they lose themselves, playing for hours, sometimes days, in an imaginary world that doesn’t need many actual toys.

And I worry that if we give them too much, they won’t realise how much they have or how little others have. I know what my mother and mother-in-law are both thinking – no, it’s not my own special form of post-natal depression and bah humbug.

Things I miss about London (Part 3): Spooks

I should say that watching Spooks from Australia makes me miss London. Spooks will give you a slightly misleading view of London. In Spooks, it never rains, the Northern Line is always working, it is possible to cross the city and diffuse a bomb in 8 minutes, the A&E wards are never overcrowded and budget cuts only seem to affect people like Harry Pearce who are trying to keep us safe for less, not real people lining up at, you know, places like real law centres that are closing down. But Spooks is thrilling and entertaining – I love it and its London.

In Spooks’ London, very pretty men dressed like G Star Raw models are constantly running through its perpetually sunny streets. They never seem to sweat heavily into their perfectly tailored clothing, no matter how close London is to total annihilation (again), and no one ever uses an inhaler after such exertions. Not that there is anything wrong with needing an inhaler after you save the world. Husband frequently needs one and he makes it look sexy.

In Spooks’ London, small but supernaturally strong, icy blonde women, also dressed immaculately in G Star Raw, say things like, “Don’t move or I will kill you with this biro.” The closest I get to that is thinking “I am going to kill that child” when I see Tercero’s handiwork with a biro, or more likely (as we are still living with my parents) “My mother is going to kill me when she sees Tercero’s handiwork with a biro….”

These same women can drive Lexus SUVs at high speeds, forwards and backwards, and the pressure of being observed by the FSB never seems to faze them when they are reverse parallel parking.  The pressure of being watched by the latte loving mummies of Red Hill is enough to make me arrive at school 15 minutes earlier than every one else so I can park (and repark) before they arrive.

When I lived in London, Spooks fed my over-imaginative paranoia. I am the passenger on the plane who always reads the Safety on Board booklet. When the flight attendant says “Please note the emergency exits” I note the emergency exits. I am the parent who says things like, “Husband, if we crash, you take odds, I’ll take evens” (Yes, we organise and allocate our children in a variety of ways, for example by: numbers, odds/evens, prime numbers, gender, vomiters/non vomiters, whingers/criers etc).

After one particularly moving episode of Spooks, in which my brother-in-law (an actor of great international renown in family circles), played an A-Q informant and died dramatically in Liverpool Street station, I found myself approaching the station every day on my way to work with heightened suspicion, racially profiling every one from the Asians to the eastern Europeans to my own reflection. If you look at me for long enough, I think you’ll agree I look like Indian Intelligence, perhaps even Special Forces.

When I was a girl I wanted to be a spy. My mother bought me a little spy kit and armed with baby powder and a roll of sticky tape I would dust down a room for prints.  I tried the credit card in the door thing and it only works in the movies. When I lived in London, watching Spooks made me look at CCTV cameras in a completely different way, and ponder the emotional baggage and short life spans of our secret services. If I was Ros, I’d probably have issues too. It also made me put civil liberties organisations such as Liberty and Reprieve in the family address book, under ICEVCR for “In Case of Emergency and Violation of Constitutional Rights.”

Regular watchers of Spooks didn’t need Wikileaks to tell them that Russia is controlled by corrupt oligarchs, the US still clings to its hegemony using under-handed and heavy-handed means, China will be the top dog in the new world order and super-spies look awesome in tight black clothing. Harry Pearce was on top of all of that by Season 3.

Now that I live in Australia and still miss London, a dear friend sends me new episodes of Spooks that she records for me. They keep me thrilled and entertained.  And although my life in Primrose Hill could not have been further from Spooks, I have never used a biro as a bayonet, when I watch those pretty boys run through the streets of one of the world’s most beautiful cities, I long for its perpetually sun-kissed streets and I think “Thank God for Harry Pearce”.  When it’s over, I make myself watch the BBC World Weather, I think about George Alagaiah in his thermals and snow boots, and I remind myself that you shouldn’t believe everything you see on TV.